Tag Archives: homepage

Downing Street 20 Oct 2021

Campaigners take Stop Sizewell C message to Whitehall

 

[WHITEHALL] Ahead of the Chancellor’s Spending Review and Budget, campaign group Stop Sizewell C has taken its message “Don’t Buy Sizewell C” directly to political leaders. A digital Advan played a campaign video outside Downing Street, the Treasury and the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. Yesterday’s Net Zero strategy omitted to explain how the government proposed to fund a new large-scale nuclear power station, which it still claims to support.

 

Alison Downes of Stop Sizewell C said “With ministers still failing to answer the billion pound question about how new nuclear projects will be paid for, we’ve brought our message directly to the heart of government, to say ‘don’t buy Sizewell C’. The UK still has the choice to build back greener, faster, and say no to damaging, slow, risky, expensive and politically controversial Sizewell C, and to warn them that public opposition to any nuclear construction tax is growing. We will continue to do all we can to say Stop Sizewell C.”

 

The audio reads: 

“Sizewell C is the wrong project in the wrong place. It doesn’t belong in a truly green net zero strategy. It’s too risky, too unproven, too expensive – and too late.

The nuclear power plant would be built on a fragile coastline, surrounded by rare wildlife habitats, including the national treasure, Minsmere. 

100,000 people already object to a new tax for its 20 billion pound construction.

Leading the world to Net Zero means aiming for 100% renewables, with a flexible grid, backed by storage and energy efficiency.

Please – don’t buy Sizewell C.

 

Video and stills are available from here: https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1h96CMl0v7DT1zxFmhlKRKh16JQTH7l7a  . Please note new high resolution video and stills are currently being added. The campaign video itself can be viewed at: https://youtu.be/puak3MdPcbU

Credits – voice by actor and writer Laura Patch, who was born in Lowestoft: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1131200, images by Director Antony Easton, editing by Steve Sutton, UK Aerial Photography Ltd, audio by Toby Andersen.

35,000 tell government: don’t raise our energy bills to subsidise new nuclear plant

Community and consumer campaigners say the “regulated asset base” funding model will expose electricity bill-payers to huge cost and habitual overspends of nuclear developers such as EDF

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 11 October 2019

[LONDON] Today, campaigners from Sizewell, Hinkley Point and Bradwell nuclear sites and  consumer group SumOfUs will visit the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy to deliver a 35,454-signature petition protesting the government’s proposal to subsidise new nuclear power plants by hiking energy bills.

The petition calls on the government to scrap plans to subsidise the nuclear industry through a “regulated asset base” (RAB) funding model, under which consumers would be forced to pay a surcharge on their energy bills for new nuclear power projects such as Sizewell C in Suffolk and Bradwell B in Essex.

“Government Ministers need to think again about the u-turn that is this “Ridiculous Atomic Bailout” said Alison Downes of Theberton & Eastbridge Action Group on Sizewell. “Hinkley Point has proven that this generation of new nuclear is a non-starter commercially, but making us, the consumer, pay through our electricity bills to build something so expensive, outdated, slow and politically unpopular is unacceptable, especially in such environmentally sensitive locations as Sizewell and Bradwell.” 

Of the 35,454 people who have signed the SumOfUs petition, 2,932 are EDF customers and 14,689 are customers who have chosen a renewable electricity tariff. Over 4,000 people have also contacted BEIS directly to raise their objections to the RAB funding model through a SumOfUs action page.

“It is preposterous that consumers should be forced to subsidise private corporations,” said Sondhya Gupta, campaigns manager at SumOfUs. “Nuclear energy is a technology fraught with difficulties and there are better, cheaper and more sustainable options out there to help guarantee our energy security. It’s time the government listened to what bill payers want.”

Originally intended to be part of an Energy White Paper, BEIS quietly pushed its consultation on the controversial RAB model out in mid July. The scheme has attracted significant criticism, especially in the light of EDF’s announced £3 billion overspend at Hinkley Point, to which the BBC’s Simon Jack respondedMaking a forty-year bet on another nuclear station with a funding model that exposes consumers to those overruns, is a big call for any government to make.” The consultation closes on 14 October.

“Hinkley Point C will cost consumers somewhere between £27bn and £50bn over 35 years. Rather than admit that nuclear power is far too expensive, especially after cost estimates for the new station have leaped by £3bn to £23bn, the Government has come up with a new way to fleece consumers which shifts the risk for future reactors onto hard pressed bill payers. Time for them to drop this ridiculous plan now.” said Sue Aubrey of Stop Hinkley.

“The fact is that without this model, EDF cannot pay for Sizewell”  said Chris Wilson of Together Against Sizewell C. “The Moorside and Wylfa fiascos show us that without massive subsidies, nuclear projects will crash and burn. Instead of tying us to expensive white elephants, Government should instead be looking for ways to accelerate the growth of renewable energy, which is cheaper and quicker to deliver, and transforming energy distribution to a more flexible grid which removes the need for “baseload” energy.“

“In addition to opposing new nuclear build altogether BANNG vigorously objects to the RAB approach. This effectively gives an unquantified scale of financial support to overseas states (in respect of EDF and CGN) governed by a new, zero track record regulator with a vested interest in maintaining their own livelihoods” said Peter Banks of BANNG.

The community groups taking part in the petition delivery are Theberton & Eastbridge Action Group on Sizewell, Together Against Sizewell C, Blackwater Against New Nuclear (BANNG, Bradwell), Stop Hinkley, the B1122 Action Group (Sizewell) and Minsmere Levels Stakeholder Group.

/ENDS

Notes to editors:

  1. View photos from the petition delivery here: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/xif8p52t1uummhp/AABc5RL8Y8Ji4xLH7ABTTlT_a?dl=0
  2. View the SumOfUs petition: https://actions.sumofus.org/a/no-energy-bill-surcharge-for-new-nuclear
  3. View a briefing on the regulated asset base funding model produced by Theberton & Eastbridge Action Group on Sizewell: https://stopsizewellc.org/rab/  

Contact:

For comment and more details, please contact: Sondhya Gupta – 07811186937, sondhya @sumofus.org, Alison Downes – 07711 843884, info@stopsizewellc.org