Sizewell C – Wrong Project, Wrong Time, Wrong Place.

Stop Sizewell C statement on Sizewell C’s Final Investment Decision, 22 July 2025.

“This much-delayed Final Investment Decision has only crawled over the line thanks to guarantees that the public purse, not private investors, will carry the can for the inevitable cost overruns. Even so, UK households will soon be hit with a new Sizewell C construction tax on their energy bills. It is astounding that it is only now, as contracts are being signed, that the government has confessed that Sizewell C’s cost has almost doubled to an eye watering £38 billion – a figure that will only go up. Given that Ministers claimed not to recognise the cost was close to £40 billion is there any wonder there is so little trust in this project?”

WHAT YOU CAN DO…

StopSizewellC on X (Twitter)

"The cost [of Westinghouse's reactors] of £7.5 bn per gigawatt of new capacity is significantly cheaper than the UK's #SizewellC (£11.9 bn per gigawatt). Critics have blamed factors including the UK’s choice of #EDF’s “#EPR” reactor...."
#StopSizewellC
https://www.thetimes.com/business-money/companies/article/americas-80bn-nuclear-reactor-fleet-exposes-sizewell-c-costs-qxcqfdv5z/

You don't say: "Regulators the Office for Nuclear Regulation and the Environment Agency have raised concerns about uncertainty facing Nuclear Waste Services [#nuclearwaste] geological disposal facility programme."
#StopSizewellC

#SizewellC remains controversial. Local campaign groups are trying to block construction... as well as questioning the claimed economic benefits. Opponents argue consumers will be on the hook for delays and cost-overruns."
#StopSizewellC

Load More

StopSizewellC on Facebook

Stop Sizewell C
Stop Sizewell C18 hours ago
"The cost [of Westinghouse's reactors] of about $10 billion (£7.5 billion) per gigawatt of new capacity is significantly cheaper than the UK government’s recently approved plans for the #SizewellC plant in Suffolk. Sizewell is due to generate 3.2 gigawatts of electricity — enough to power six million homes — at a cost of £38 billion, or £11.9 billion per gigawatt.

The contrast will do nothing to alleviate concerns about the high costs of Britain’s nuclear programme, although the US plans are still at a much earlier stage. Critics have blamed factors including the UK’s choice of EDF’s “EPR” reactor and safety red tape for inflating nuclear construction costs in Britain. The costs of the 3.2GW Hinkley Point plant in Somerset, already under construction, are estimated to have risen to as much as £48 billion."

#StopSizewellC

Stop Sizewell C
Stop Sizewell C2 days ago
You don't say: "Regulators the Office for Nuclear Regulation and the Environment Agency have raised concerns about uncertainty facing Nuclear Waste Services [#nuclearwaste] geological disposal facility programme."
#StopSizewellC
Stop Sizewell C
Stop Sizewell C3 days ago
#SizewellC remains controversial. Local campaign groups are trying to block construction... as well as questioning the claimed economic benefits. Opponents argue consumers will be on the hook for delays and cost-overruns."
#StopSizewellC
Stop Sizewell C
Stop Sizewell C5 days ago
#StopSizewellC @tasizewellc @@suffolkenergyactionseas #stopsealink
Stop Sizewell C
Stop Sizewell C6 days ago
Predictable doesn't even begin to describe it, but @CommonsESNZ seems to have misunderstood how planning examinations currently work (they don't examine technology), and shame on them for repeating the insulting "blockers" rhetoric.
#StopSizewellC
Stop Sizewell C
Stop Sizewell C7 days ago
.@jonathonporritt says kill off #SizewellC! Yep, we can sign up to that!
#StopSizewellC