Sizewell C – Wrong Project, Wrong Time, Wrong Place.
Stop Sizewell C has been campaigning on the Suffolk-based twin EPR nuclear reactor project since 2013; first as Theberton and Eastbridge Action Group on Sizewell and, since 2019, as Stop Sizewell C. While our initial concern about Sizewell C focused on the impacts of such a large infrastructure project in a singularly unsuited area, we have since 2019 maintained that Sizewell C is the wrong project, at the wrong time, in the wrong place.
-
- Wrong project. In addition to its eye-watering cost – which means its electricity will also be expensive – the EPR reactor has a woeful delivery and operational track record, making it an unreliable energy “solution”. We fully oppose the financing structure of Sizewell C, with a tax – and risk – imposed on households during construction.
- Wrong time. Nuclear gigawatt projects take well over a decade to construct, even without the likely delays with building the EPR, so Sizewell C will not be operational in time to contribute to meaningful target dates to reduce carbon emissions and be a solution to our climate emergency.
- Wrong place. Ironically, coastal nuclear power is vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, and this is a particular concern at Sizewell. Additionally the Sizewell C site is surrounded by protected wildlife habitats and adjoins internationally famous Minsmere and is wholly within the Suffolk Coast & Heaths National Landscape and was opposed by the RSPB and Suffolk Wildlife Trust. Sustainable supplies of drinking-quality water are uncertain and meant the Planning Inspectorate was unable to recommend Sizewell C be granted Planning Consent.
Stop Sizewell C has published a report “Sizewell C, the Unanswered Questions” which draws together what is known, what it is impossible to know, and what the government continues to keep secret about Sizewell C.
WHAT YOU CAN DO.
- Join our mailing list: Sign up here to receive email updates. To contact us, email info@stopsizewellc.org.
- Donate. If you are able to give, please visit www.stopsizewellc.org/donate
- Follow us on social media (X, Facebook, Instagram, Bluesky, Threads and LinkedIn, @stopsizewellc)
- For more information on why we oppose Sizewell C, visit our Why Stop Sizewell C? page.
StopSizewellC on X (Twitter)
The owners of Pontins Pakefield have "now revealed plans to develop an additional 340 caravan pitches for more contractors to use during the #SizewellC project."
#StopSizewellC
Wait so "NESO says the [UK] will become “a net exporter of electricity across the year” by 2030" - surely that means we don't need #SizewellC? At least Ambrose Evans-Pritchard "struggles to enthuse over the £40bn Sizewell C #nuclear project"
#StopSizewellC
#HinkleyC: "Almost 400 residents have already shared their own experiences through [local MPs'] survey, identifying problem streets and explaining the impact Houses in Multiple Occupancy (HMOs) are having on the places they call home"
#StopSizewellC
https://www.bridgwatermercury.co.uk/news/26426032.hundreds-bridgwater-residents-sign-petition-hmos
StopSizewellC on Facebook
#StopSizewellC
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3ekdzgpe8qo
#StopSizewellC
https://montelnews.com/news/f0c352b0-9493-4d41-b58d-215868811341
#StopSizewellC
#StopSizewellC #Bridgwater #SizewellC
#Suffolk #Minsmere #Dunwich
BBC
(Apologies all, a previous post about the fire quoted a news piece we have subsequently learned was incorrect)
#Suffolk #Minsmere #Dunwich
#Dunwich" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgl4#Dunwich
*Apologies all, the previous version of this post linked to another news article which contained information we have subsequently learned was not correct*
