Sizewell C – Wrong Project, Wrong Time, Wrong Place.

Stop Sizewell C has been campaigning on the Suffolk-based twin EPR nuclear reactor project since 2013; first as Theberton and Eastbridge Action Group on Sizewell and, since 2019, as Stop Sizewell C. While our initial concern about Sizewell C focused on the impacts of such a large infrastructure project in a singularly unsuited area, we have since 2019 maintained that Sizewell C is the wrong project, at the wrong time, in the wrong place.

    • Wrong project. In addition to its eye-watering cost – which means its electricity will also be expensive – the EPR reactor has a woeful delivery and operational track record, making it an unreliable energy “solution”. We fully oppose the financing structure of Sizewell C, with a tax – and risk – imposed on households during construction.
    • Wrong time. Nuclear gigawatt projects take well over a decade to construct, even without the likely delays with building the EPR, so Sizewell C will not be operational in time to contribute to meaningful target dates to reduce carbon emissions and be a solution to our climate emergency. 
    • Wrong place. Ironically, coastal nuclear power is vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, and this is a particular concern at Sizewell. Additionally the Sizewell C site is surrounded by protected wildlife habitats and adjoins internationally famous Minsmere and is wholly within the Suffolk Coast & Heaths National Landscape and was opposed by the RSPB and Suffolk Wildlife Trust. Sustainable supplies of drinking-quality water are uncertain and meant the Planning Inspectorate was unable to recommend Sizewell C be granted Planning Consent. 

Stop Sizewell C has published a report “Sizewell C, the Unanswered Questions” which draws together what is known, what it is impossible to know, and what the government continues to keep secret about Sizewell C.

WHAT YOU CAN DO.

StopSizewellC on X (Twitter)

"Andy Burnham talks of his 'Makerfield test' when leading as Prime Minister, and for me it will proudly be the 'Suffolk Coastal test' – pushing hard to make sure we deliver better for rural communities, and better nationally and internationally for nature"

“#SizewellC [has no]useful info about how long #SizewellC will take to build, which, considering that taxpayers and householders are stumping up vast quantities of cash, is unjustifiable and disrespectful to struggling local communities" 1/4
#StopSizewellC

Ask @andyburnham and new Energy Secretary @Miatsf Miatta Fahnbulleh to cancel #SizewellC!
#StopSizewellC
details here👇https://mailchi.mp/ce0d605a0534/andyburnhammiattafahnbulleh

#StopSizewellC congratulates new Prime Minister @andyburnham and new #EnergySecretary @Miatsf: urges both to cancel #SizewellC and stop it guzzling taxpayers' money and fleecing households over the next decade++ before any electricity will be generated!

Load More

StopSizewellC on Facebook

Stop Sizewell C
Stop Sizewell C1 day ago
Jenny Riddell-Carpenter: "Andy Burnham talks of his 'Makerfield test' when leading as Prime Minister, and for me it will proudly be the 'Suffolk Coastal test' – pushing hard to make sure we deliver better for rural communities, and better nationally and internationally for nature"
#StopSizewellC
Stop Sizewell C
Stop Sizewell C2 days ago
After reviewing the [#SizewellC Annual] report, a #StopSizewellC spokesperson told NCE: “Sizewell C’s Annual Report broadly complies with Ministers’ obdurate refusal to give any useful information about how long Sizewell C will take to build, which, considering that taxpayers and householders are stumping up vast quantities of cash, is unjustifiable and disrespectful to struggling local communities.

“The only reveal is that “J-zero” is expected sometime in 2029. Given the complex site de-watering, cut-off wall construction and platform raising, it is little wonder that it will be at least five years since works formally began, in January 2024, before Sizewell C can even begin above-ground construction.

“We maintain that the chances of Sizewell C being delivered on schedule are slim to none, and the new prime minister and energy secretary would be better off cancelling it now.”

University of Greenwich emeritus professor of energy policy and Energy Policy editor-in-chief Steve Thomas told NCE that the construction timeline in the report shows “how hollow all the Fingleton nonsense was, that it takes five years of site prep to get to construction start. Not because of regulation or planning.”

Stop Sizewell C
Stop Sizewell C4 days ago
Ask Andy Burnham and new Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh to cancel #SizewellC!
#StopSizewellC
details here👇
https://mailchi.mp/ce0d605a0534/andyburnhammiattafahnbulleh
Stop Sizewell C
Stop Sizewell C5 days ago
#StopSizewellC congratulates new Prime Minister @andyburnham and new #EnergySecretary @Miatsf: urges both to cancel #SizewellC and stop it guzzling taxpayers' money and fleecing households over the next decade++ before any electricity will be generated!
Stop Sizewell C
Stop Sizewell C5 days ago
#SizewellC is surely in the subtext of Greg Jackson's OpEd?
"[@andyburnham] The new Prime Minister has an energy dilemma: slash bills or continue net zero. That is false framing. The current path is expensive, relentlessly increasing costs for families and businesses. It doesn’t have to be like this."
#StopSizewellC
Stop Sizewell C
Stop Sizewell C1 week ago
This was news to us - not that #SizewellC works would impact #SizewellB - but that rock armour would be needed at this stage of the build. We understand it means the coastal footpath will have to be moved seaward - again
#StopSizewellC