Sizewell C – Wrong Project, Wrong Time, Wrong Place.
Stop Sizewell C has been campaigning on the Suffolk-based twin EPR nuclear reactor project since 2013; first as Theberton and Eastbridge Action Group on Sizewell and, since 2019, as Stop Sizewell C. While our initial concern about Sizewell C focused on the impacts of such a large infrastructure project in a singularly unsuited area, we have since 2019 maintained that Sizewell C is the wrong project, at the wrong time, in the wrong place.
-
- Wrong project. In addition to its eye-watering cost – which means its electricity will also be expensive – the EPR reactor has a woeful delivery and operational track record, making it an unreliable energy “solution”. We fully oppose the financing structure of Sizewell C, with a tax – and risk – imposed on households during construction.
- Wrong time. Nuclear gigawatt projects take well over a decade to construct, even without the likely delays with building the EPR, so Sizewell C will not be operational in time to contribute to meaningful target dates to reduce carbon emissions and be a solution to our climate emergency.
- Wrong place. Ironically, coastal nuclear power is vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, and this is a particular concern at Sizewell. Additionally the Sizewell C site is surrounded by protected wildlife habitats and adjoins internationally famous Minsmere and is wholly within the Suffolk Coast & Heaths National Landscape and was opposed by the RSPB and Suffolk Wildlife Trust. Sustainable supplies of drinking-quality water are uncertain and meant the Planning Inspectorate was unable to recommend Sizewell C be granted Planning Consent.
Stop Sizewell C has published a report “Sizewell C, the Unanswered Questions” which draws together what is known, what it is impossible to know, and what the government continues to keep secret about Sizewell C.
WHAT YOU CAN DO.
- Join our mailing list: Sign up here to receive email updates. To contact us, email info@stopsizewellc.org.
- Donate. If you are able to give, please visit www.stopsizewellc.org/donate
- Follow us on social media (X, Facebook, Instagram, Bluesky, Threads and LinkedIn, @stopsizewellc)
- For more information on why we oppose Sizewell C, visit our Why Stop Sizewell C? page.
StopSizewellC on X (Twitter)
"#SizewellC is a “terrible deal” for the UK taxpayer.....The public accounts committee said the high level of risk borne by taxpayers and consumers was “extraordinary” while private investors were expected to receive significant returns."
#StopSizewellC
Expressing solidarity with @SEAScampaign S.A.N.D and everyone who worked so hard to stop #SeaLink. Weird that the #EADT would quote Suffolk leaders but not campaigners, while headlining their piece with our joint protest. What gives? #StopSizewellC
Mandy Beaumont, who is part of the B1125 Action Group, said: "After having been promised that #SizewellC would bring improvements to local areas, this particular area is being turned into a race track".
#StopSizewellC
““Given the Public Accounts Committee has exposed #SizewellC’s terrible deal, we call on the government to learn from HS2 and cancel Sizewell C now, before any more public money is wasted.
#StopSizewellC
StopSizewellC on Facebook
The public accounts committee said the high level of risk borne by taxpayers and consumers for Sizewell C was “extraordinary” while private investors were expected to receive significant returns."
#StopSizewellC
#StopSizewellC
#StopSizewellC
“We welcome the Public Accounts Committee’s conclusion that the funding of #SizewellC represents a ‘terrible deal’ for the UK taxpayer, with investors guaranteed generous returns and protection from overspends and overruns, while taxpayers and consumers carry the can on a project that is certain to do both.
“Given the PAC has exposed Sizewell C’s terrible deal, we call on the government to learn from HS2 and cancel Sizewell C now, before any more public money is wasted.
“We believe the savings from forcing households to pay Sizewell C’s inflated electricity prices for 60 years would pay for any abandonment costs at this early stage, multiple times over. These savings should be dedicated to renewables, storage and energy efficiency.”
#StopSizewellC
and "you don’t have to be the PAC chairman Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown to find the “high level of risk” borne by taxpayers and consumers [for #SizewellC] “extraordinary”. Who’d have guessed that Miliband and Reeves could produce something so financially radioactive?"
#StopSizewellC
