Category Archives: News

Education chiefs: ‘Sizewell C will benefit our young people’

28 June 2019. Read online at https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/education-and-business-leaders-support-edf-sizewell-c-1-6130929

Education and business leaders from across the region have hailed the Sizewell C project as a “once in a generation” opportunity to boost skills among local people.

The group, including headteachers, CEOs and a university’ vice-chancellor, have voiced their support for the new nuclear power station, arguing it will “boost employment, education and skills” and play an “essential role” in tackling climate change.

In an open letter published today, the leaders said: “We support Sizewell C because we support the East of England.”

Suffolk New College principal, Viv Gillespie, said the college was “happy to offer support and backing on this issue”.

“As a college, we naturally work with the business community to help develop partnerships that will help benefit both Suffolk New College students and local organisations,” she said.

“We offer a range of courses at the college and are developing further STEM programmes that can support the creation of a new workforce of tomorrow for a range of organisations (including Sizewell C).”

Jim Crawford, Sizewell C project development director, said: “We welcome this letter of support from education, business and charity sector leaders in the region. The construction and operation of Sizewell C will bring thousands of new jobs to the local area and provide a boost in skills, training and education.

“We are working closely with a network of local schools, colleges and charities to raise aspirations, develop training opportunities and apprenticeships for young people, who will then be equipped with skills they can use throughout their careers, either as part of the project or more widely in the local community.”

‘Visitors will be driven away’

Sizewell C will sit next to the existing stations of Sizewell B and A on the Suffolk coastline – but there are concerns about the impact it will have the environment and the damage the building of the new site could cause to the Suffolk countryside.

Alison Downes, co-chair of Theberton and Eastbridge Action Group on Sizewell (TEAGS), said: “We are dismayed that this support for Sizewell C and the East of England neglects to consider the damage to the riches of our environment, and entirely ignores losses to tourism income and jobs brought about by the impacts of a massive 10+ year construction project on our beautiful landscape.

“Noise, pollution, damage to the AONB and extreme traffic congestion will certainly drive visitors away for an extended period.

“Given that EDF is planning to build a campus at Eastbridge for 2,400 construction workers, plus a caravan site for a further 600, that’s a huge number of people who are not from the local area working on the project. And indeed, according to the Office of National Statistics, our district enjoys some of the lowest levels of unemployment in the country.

“Nuclear power is not the only solution to our climate crisis; the carbon footprint of such a huge construction project as Sizewell C will be enormous.

“Of course we want our children to have a bright future, but surely not at any price.”

EDF has held a series of consultations over the proposals as they prepare to make a formal planning application.

You may also want to watch:

Suffolk Councils Respond To Sizewell C ConsultationSuffolk Councils Respond To Sizewell C Consultation

Volume 90% Watch more great local videosSuffolk Councils Respond To Sizewell C ConsultationSuffolk councils respond to Sizewell C consultationProtesters against the Sizewell C power stationSizewell C opposition groups oppose plans for a nuclear plantActivists speak out over latest Sizewell C ConsultationFarmers’ shock as full extent of Sizewell C road and rail plans revealed

‘Develop home-grown talent’

The letter, signed by 10 leaders from the education and business sectors, said: “Sizewell C offers a once in a generation opportunity to boost employment, education and skills in the region and will play an essential role in tackling the climate change crisis. We must take this opportunity for the benefit of our children and theirs too.

“We can see the progress being made at Hinkley Point C in Somerset and how the impact of construction is being balanced by the huge opportunities for local people.

“Just two years into the project there are 4,000 workers on the site each day – half from the local area and 400 apprentices already learning new skills. Contracts with businesses in the region have already reached £1.5billion. Sizewell C will offer similar benefits for Suffolk. “Young people in this region deserve the same opportunities through Sizewell C which will bring 1,000 apprenticeships and thousands of jobs to the area.

“Our schools, colleges and youth organisations are working with the existing power station Sizewell B and the Sizewell C project. We want to develop home-grown talent and help them stay and develop their skills in the region so they can live, work and bring up their families in an area with a bright future.

“We support Sizewell C because we support the East of England.”

Signed:

Professor David J Richardson, Vice-Chancellor & President, University of East Anglia

Dr Nikos Savvas, Principal, West Suffolk College

Dan Mayhew, Principal, Alde Valley Academy

Stuart Rimmer, Principal, East Coast College

Viv Gillespie, Principal, Suffolk New College

Terry Baxter, CEO, Inspire Suffolk

Emma Ratzer, CEO, Access Community Trust

John Dugmore, CEO, Suffolk Chamber of Commerce

Doug Field, Chair, New Anglia LEP

Simon Gray, CEO, East of England Energy Group

Objection to Sizewell B facilities relocation

On 9 September 2019, East Suffolk Council’s Strategic Planning Committee will consider EDF’s application for the relocation of Sizewell B facilities, DC/19/1637/FUL. Officers are recommending that the application be approved.

TEAGS requests supporters to contact members of the Committee and draw their attention to local concerns. You can resend your own objection (if you submitted one), or can refer to an article in the EADT about Suffolk Preservation Society’s opposition: see https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/coronation-wood-to-be-felled-for-sizewell-c-1-6209336 and TEAGS response (view below)

SAMPLE MESSAGE: NB It is not appropriate to tell Councillors how to vote on EDF’s application, as this constitutes lobbying and may compromise their role on the Committee, however, you can explain your own opinion. Include Planning Application DC/19/1637/FUL and your full name and address to show you live in East Suffolk. Contacts below

Dear [Councillor….],
I am writing to draw your attention to a recent article published by the East Anglian Daily Times, on the views of Suffolk Preservation Society on EDF’s Sizewell B Planning Application DC/19/1637/FUL.  https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/coronation-wood-to-be-felled-for-sizewell-c-1-6209336. My own view on this application is that it should only be considered as part of a Sizewell C Development Consent Order (DCO) procedure for the following reasons:

  • The primary purpose for relocating Sizewell B facilities is to make space for Sizewell C. It would be inappropriate to approve a development that would remove around 90% of  Coronation Wood and up to 50% of Pill Box Field when the DCO request for Sizewell C has neither been submitted nor approved, and when the National Policy Statement on site selection for new nuclear reactors is under review.
  • The cumulative impact on communities and the environment of this proposal and other proposed energy infrastructure will be considerable. The County Council and former Suffolk Coastal District Council have worked hard to ensure these projects are designated as Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIPs), and given the interconnectedness of this application with EDF’s Sizewell C proposals, I consider it is inappropriate to exclude this part of the project from the NSIP / DCO process.
  • In the event of Sizewell C not going ahead, it would be unacceptable for landscape to have been destroyed for no reason. I consider that EDF should be able to upgrade its facilities without further damage to the landscape.
  • With the interconnectedness of this project with Sizewell C, I consider it is ironic that EDF is seeking permission from East Suffolk Council when the County Council and former Suffolk Coastal District Council – major statutory consultees – are withholding their support for Sizewell C.

Strategic Planning Committee Members are: Melissa Allen, Orwell and Villages, melissa.allen@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, Paul Ashdown, Lothingland, paul.ashdown@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, Stuart Bird, Western Felixstowe, stuart.bird@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, Chris Blundell, Martlesham and Purdis Farm, chris.blundell@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, Jocelyn Bond, Aldeburgh and Leiston, jocelyn.bond@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, Norman Brooks, Wrentham, Wangford and Westleton, norman.brooks@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, Jenny Ceresa, Carlton Colville, jenny.ceresa@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, Tony Cooper, Aldeburgh and Leiston, tony.cooper@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, Linda Coulam, Gunton and St Margarets, linda.coulam@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, Mike Deacon, Western Felixstowe, michael.deacon@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, Graham Elliot, Beccles and Worlingham, graham.elliott@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, Tony Fryatt, Carlford and Fynn Valley, tony.fryatt@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, Andree Gee, Oulton Broad, andree.gee@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, Colin Hedgley, Carlford and Fynn Valley, colin.hedgley@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, Debbie McCallum, Kesgrave, debbie.mccallum@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, Malcolm Pitchers, Kirkley and Pakefield, malcolm.pitchers@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, David Ritchie, Bungay and Wainford, david.ritchie@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, Craig Rivett, Carlton Colville, craig.rivett@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, Kay Yule, Woodbridge, kay.yule@eastsuffolk.gov.uk.

There are also numerous substitutes see https://eastsuffolk.cmis.uk.com/eastsuffolk/Committees/tabid/62/ctl/ViewCMIS_CommitteeDetails/mid/381/id/8/Default.aspx (Members)

Emails for mass sending: melissa.allen@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, paul.ashdown@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, edward.back@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, stuart.bird@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, chris.blundell@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, jocelyn.bond@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, norman.brooks@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, jenny.ceresa@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, tony.cooper@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, linda.coulam@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, michael.deacon@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, graham.elliott@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, tony.fryatt@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, andree.gee@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, colin.hedgley@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, debbie.mccallum@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, malcolm.pitchers@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, david.ritchie@eastsuffolk.gov.uk, craig.rivett@eastsuffolk.gov.uk , kay.yule@eastsuffolk.gov.uk

TEAGS’s OBJECTION IN FULL – view or download below